Prior Prompt Engineering
for Reinforcement Fine-Tuning

Exploring how strategic prompt engineering during training can internalize complex reasoning behaviors in language models, moving beyond traditional inference-time approaches.

Pittawat Taveekitworachai
May 2025
5
pPE Strategies Tested
7B
Parameter Model
Null-example pPE Achieves Largest Gains
Superior performance on AIME2024 and GPQA-Diamond benchmarks

Introduction to Prior Prompt Engineering

Prior Prompt Engineering (pPE) represents a paradigm shift in how we approach Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) for Language Models. Unlike traditional inference-time prompt engineering, which aims to elicit specific behaviors during deployment, pPE focuses on internalizing desired behaviors directly into the model's fundamental response patterns.

Core Innovation

The research translates successful inference-time strategies—such as Chain-of-Thought reasoning, Plan-and-Solve, and Program-of-Thought—into training-time prompts that shape the model's intrinsic problem-solving methodology.

The motivation stems from recognizing that while existing RFT research has concentrated on optimizing algorithms, reward functions, and data curation, the systematic design of instructional prompts used during training has remained relatively underexplored. This gap represents a significant opportunity to enhance LM capabilities.

Five Investigated pPE Strategies

The study systematically evaluates five distinct pPE strategies, each translated from successful inference-time prompt engineering techniques. These strategies are designed to instill specific problem-solving behaviors in language models during the RFT process.

Think

Reasoning

Inspired by Chain-of-Thought (CoT)

Encourages explicit, step-by-step reasoning before arriving at final answers, cultivating systematic problem decomposition.

Plan

Planning

Based on Plan-and-Solve (PS)

Guides models to formulate high-level strategies and roadmaps before executing solution approaches.

Code

Code-based Reasoning

Derived from Program-of-Thought (PoT)

Leverages programming code as a tool for algorithmic problem-solving and computational thinking.

Knowledge

Knowledge Recall

From Generated Knowledge Prompting

Prompts explicit retrieval and articulation of relevant facts, definitions, or formulas before problem-solving.

Examples

Null-example Utilization

Based on Null-shot Prompting

Encourages generating illustrative examples or counterexamples to understand problem boundaries and patterns.

Achieved largest performance gains

Experimental Setup

Model Architecture

Qwen2.5-7B

7-billion parameter language model

All pPE variants were trained using the same base model to ensure fair comparison and isolate the effects of different prompt engineering strategies.

Reward Design

Dual Reward System

Accuracy + Format adherence

Accuracy Reward: 0.5 points
Format Reward: 0.5 points
Total Maximum: 1.0 point

Evaluation Benchmarks

Mathematical Reasoning

  • AIME2024 - American Invitational Mathematics Examination
  • AMC12 '22-'23 - American Mathematics Competition
  • MATH-500 - Pre-university level mathematics

General Capabilities

  • GPQA-Diamond - Graduate-level Q&A
  • HumanEval+ - Code generation correctness

Key Findings and Results

Breakthrough Discovery

Language Models trained using pPE strategies consistently outperformed their inference-time prompted counterparts across all evaluated benchmarks, demonstrating the superiority of internalizing behaviors during training.

Superior Performance of Null-example pPE

Null-example Utilization

Achieved largest average performance gain

AIME2024 Performance
Highest improvement on challenging mathematical reasoning
GPQA-Diamond Excellence
Superior graduate-level question answering

Distinct Behavioral Styles

Cultivating Thinking Modes

Each pPE strategy instills unique problem-solving approaches

The research demonstrates that different pPE strategies lead to observable differences in how models approach tasks, effectively creating specialized AI "thinking" modes.

Domain Generalization

Performance improvements extended beyond the training domain (mathematics) to other areas:

GPQA (General Q&A)

Enhanced performance on graduate-level reasoning tasks requiring deep understanding

HumanEval+ (Coding)

Improved code generation and functional correctness

Implications and Significance

A New Dimension for RFT Research

pPE represents a powerful, previously underexplored axis within Reinforcement Fine-Tuning, opening new avenues for model optimization beyond traditional algorithmic and reward-focused approaches.

The systematic engineering of prior prompts during training can fundamentally shape model capabilities and problem-solving approaches.

Specialized AI "Thinking" Modes

The ability to cultivate diverse cognitive styles through pPE enables the creation of specialized LMs, each optimized for different problem-solving approaches and task types.

Algorithmic Thinkers
Code-based pPE models
Strategic Planners
Plan-based pPE models

Robust Pattern Discovery

RFT demonstrates robustness in discovering useful generation patterns that generalize across domains, suggesting it functions as a mechanism for learning transferable problem-solving strategies.

Mathematical training improved performance on coding and general reasoning tasks

Conclusion

Research Contributions

1

Systematic Investigation of pPE

First comprehensive exploration of Prior Prompt Engineering's impact on model performance and behavior during RFT

2

Strategic Translation Framework

Successfully translated five inference-time prompting strategies into effective training-time pPE approaches

3

Null-example Superiority

Identified Null-example Utilization as the most effective pPE strategy, achieving largest performance gains on challenging benchmarks

4

Behavioral Specialization

Demonstrated that different pPE strategies cultivate distinct AI "thinking" modes and problem-solving styles

Future Implications

This research positions Prior Prompt Engineering as a fundamental tool for shaping AI capabilities, offering a pathway to more specialized, robust, and adaptable language models. The success of pPE suggests that how we prompt models during training is as crucial as the algorithms and rewards we use.

As we advance toward more sophisticated AI systems, pPE provides a mechanism to intentionally design not just what models can do, but how they think about solving problems.